WebBrendlin v. California United States Courts Brendlin v. California This Fourth Amendment activity is based on the landmark Supreme Court case Brendlin v. California, dealing with search and seizure during a traffic stop. WebEarlier this week, the Supreme Court ruled, in Brendlin v.California, that when a police officer effects a traffic stop of a passenger vehicle, the passengers - and not just the driver -- are "seized" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.Accordingly, the passengers - and not just the driver -- may challenge the constitutionality of the stop.

Supreme Court: Traffic Stops for Expired Driver

WebAug 3, 2015 · North Carolina, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in December. Now the principle is: Ignorance of the law is no excuse — unless you’re the cop enforcing the law, in which case it is, or at least can be, depending upon whether your ignorance is reasonable or not, to be determined upon later review. WebThe Supreme Court of the United States granted cert to decide whether a traffic stop subjects a passenger, as well as the driver, to Fourth Amendment seizure. As I noted … macbook usb adapter port

Supreme Court Hears Police Traffic-Stop Case From Kansas

WebNov 2, 1999 · The Illinois trial court denied his motion to suppress, finding the gun was recovered during a lawful stop and frisk. He was convicted of unlawful use of a weapon … WebA traffic stop of a vehicle and detention of its occupants is a seizure for Fourth Amendment purposes. A routine traffic stop is justified if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the occupant is unlicensed or the vehicle is unregistered. The officer does not need a reasonable suspicion of the occupant’s involvement in criminal ... WebFeb 11, 2024 · In Pennsylvania v. Mims, the U.S. Supreme Court held that if a police officer makes a valid traffic stop that complies with the Fourth Amendment the further action of … kitchen showroom northern virginia